Why the NSA-scandal is another fake like Benghazi

After the Benghazi fake scandal, the AP eavesdropping, the IRS, the Umbrellagate, the war on Facebook and the government shutdown, Republican's terrorist strategy is back on stage with this Astroturfed-NSA-Spying story.

This is a story about a bunch of loose wingnuts exploiting their knowledge of Intelligence reports for domestic political interests, like smearing the current President whilst trying to keep people away from social media and politics.

Although this story started long time ago:

June 17 1972, five former CIA operatives get arrested for breaking and entering into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate complex. The burglary was aimed at installing a wiretapping system and it eventually led to the President's resignation.

May 2013, former CIA employee and NSA contractor Edward Snowden disclosed classified details of several top-secret United States, Israeli, and British government mass surveillance programs to the press.

History repeating, same modus operandi, same pattern: an eavesdropping operation is being exposed to the world only to discredit the incumbent President.

At this very historical moment, President Obama is probably the most popular President in the whole history of the United States. Even though Forbes two days ago ranked him only as the second most powerful figure after Vladimir Putin.

It's always the same old story, once the White House lodger gets too much popular or too much unpopular, some people tend to get nervous about it.

In 1972 Richard Nixon had become a dead horse and it had been decided to get rid of his presence at the White House by sending a bunch of five unaware brave men to a dead-end mission. Those men's lives and careers were sacrificed on the altar of politics.

Today those same people who made Nixon resign are exploiting their narrow knowledge of Intelligence programs and reports for the only purpose of discrediting President Obama.

Two days ago, General Keith Alexander, the NSA Director, told a congressional hearing that the phone call data in question had not involved European citizens. President Obama affirmed he had no knowledge about the NSA spying over European leaders. And I completely trust them both because nor Admiral Alexander nor President Obama were dancing the Washington ballet back in 1972.

Why in the world the biggest spying agency on the planet would need to expose itself by revealing "we are spying on everyone"? It does not make any sense. A spying agency doesn't have public exposure as its business goal, quiet the contrary. Although since last May the NSA has been on the news headlines almost every day and their latest exposure of these days is the second promotional wave of this fictional movie called "let's put the President down."

Ask yourself the Roman question: Cui Prodest?

Whom does it benefit?

Who gets the more benefits from discrediting the current administration?

In the past few months Republican's "Holocaust on the Poor" agenda has been aggressively attacked by the public opinion especially through Social Media. They lost their pathetic effort to defund Obamacare, they lost their $40 bn food stamps cut, and they failed big time with the government shutdown.

They just got off the "shutdown bandwagon" while they already jumped on the NSA fake scandal's train.
This is their last train though. Thing is, if they don't get this train wreck running, they are going to lose and
lose big time.

They already lost huge chunks of consent but they still have two options: they can leave the scene with honor or they can leave the scene being humiliated.

For sure they have another genius-like Plan after this, but I don't want to even think about it, because if they are ready to shut down the government and exploiting the major spy-agency, God only knows what we have to expect from their last hour of life.

Lately I couldn't help but think to Pat Buchanan's last rant when the shutdown failed to stop the Patient Care Act: "better to destroy the country like Samson than to pass Obamacare". This is their attitude: If we don't get it, we'll destroy America.

In the meanwhile their 1960's South-American propaganda keeps going through their bunch of fake-Christian Conservatives who keep vomiting nonsense with the only purpose to nauseate people about Politics. Same old tactics, same old story.

Unfortunately we are not in the 1960s anymore nor are we in Latin America.

Things for the Grand Old Party have become extremely serious since the political debate moved to the social media environment, where they have absolutely no control over the people's opinion. The worst nightmare of the Republican Party has become real once the one-way-only media era was over.

Now we are living in the Interactive Era, where people are able to reply to the media they make comments and every single person on the planet is entitled to express his/her own opinion. It's understandable that these dinosaurs are in great distress, because the propaganda bible they are equipped with, was written in the 1950 and it doesn't say anything about social media and its sabotage.

So in response to this desperate situation they went back to the same old trick they already used dozens of times in the past 40 years:

- 1973: Watergate - the five “plumbers” who have been hired to protect the White House from possible leaks are instead being exploited with a fake wiretapping op. They have been framed to expose the eavesdropping scandal and to make President Nixon resign.

- 1981: Jimmy Carter - GOPs negotiate the delay of the Iran’s hostages release on Reagan's inauguration's day.

- 2003: Republican Richard Armitage publicly exposed CIA operative Valerie Plame as a CIA asset

- In May 2013 someone reveals that the Associated Press in Washington has been under surveillance by the NSA. President Obama affirms he has “no hand” in it.

Despite having access to sensitive data these Neanderthal really have a huge lack in terms of imagination. Exploiting their knowledge of Intelligence operations and use it for political purpose is something that even my dog can do. Then it depends HOW you do it. Do you realize this fake NSA spying thing is not only not working but it's going to crumble like a house of cards and be completely debunked while once again you are going to get exposed as the usual spoil-sports?

You have to consider that within the field of Intelligence, imagination is everything, while these loose cannons are acting like those Zoolander models who shoot gasoline on each other and then they light up a cigarette.

How can you be so mentally disabled to expect today’s audience being ready to buy the same story twice after forty years? Do you think you're dealing with a bunch of assholes?

Indeed I personally think that the U.S Attorney General should look into these series of abuses made over Federal premises and resources to investigate and find out those who are responsible of these heinous crimes against the American People, the Federal Government and the credibility of the US Government worldwide.

How in the world a bunch of crooks can be allowed to handle sensitive data and abuse the Federal Government for their own personal mischievous interest? Besides by perpetuating this NSA fake spying operation, the NSA is losing its credibility and this will inevitably lead the political debate to question the legitimacy of spying, in a world where people are instead willing to share content through Social Media.

Schizophrenic contradictions are another distinctive mark of the GOP's strategy. They don't consider what the current trends are, they head straight to the ditch. Pull the Vet's electrical wheelchair with one hand while cutting their healthcare with the other.

This whole NSA thing has the typical GOP's Neanderthal style: Aggressive news headlines aimed at spreading terror and fear in full 1950's South American propaganda style.

This brilliant project is certainly part of that same strategy that led to the government shutdown. In practice this is their R-Plan to discredit President Obama. Their dream it would be to make the President resign.

Although being these people just amateurs, they make mistakes, especially when they are too much secure of themselves. For example Rush Limbaugh yesterday compared President Obama to Richard Nixon claiming "he's a worse liar than Nixon".

First big mistake: if you conduct an Intelligence operation and you are on the field to publicly expose someone, you must never ever even mentioning or comparing a current operation with another one unless it's a third party to do so. The fact that Limbo made such a huge mistake it means they do not have enough consent and the operation is not taking off as they were expecting or at least they are too anxious to make it work. Huge mistake.

As a matter of fact this is the second launch of the NSA-commercial, having the first happened in May. This NSA thing is not working because people is not buying it like the other phony scandals and what's worse this is going to expose the wild bunch to public humiliation because narcissism when applied to Intelligence is absolutely lethal.

They made a similar mistake (probably their biggest) when they arranged the release of the American hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Teheran. Their will to discredit Jimmy Carter was so strong that they let the hostages for two more months in the hands of the terrorists, (while they could have been already be freed) just because they wanted the release to happen when Ronald Reagan swore-in on January 21, 1981.

This is narcissism and narcissism shows your weakness, it exposes your modus operandi, which is your signature and this can be a problem for any organization that wants to stay behind the scenes.

If you have a narcissist within your ranks you'd better have him fired or shift him to another position. Certainly when you work on such an important operation like freeing American Hostages in a foreign country you can't shift the release-day to please your team and your President, because you are going to get burned.

Also, I don't think the public opinion today would approve playing with people's lives only to please yourself and your pals. I do remember when Mr. Frank Carlucci on a vintage documentary he was asked if the release of the hostages was scheduled on purpose to please Mr. Reagan he denied it with a smirk.
I simply Loved it!

Unfortunately all these people are very old and they are stuck in the 1950s mentality, they think that people are still in front of their tv-set ready to buy their old school propaganda but people are not buying it because their trash is recognizable anywhere they dump it. Once you read something on the news that aims at spreading fear and terror that's the GOP signature.

You can't propose the same eavesdropping fake scandal twice after 40 years. Only the brainless follows the same route twice.

I really feel a lot of sympathy for both Admiral Alexander and President Obama at this very moment because they have been fingered for being responsible of something they do not have any control over it nor they know anything about it.

Besides they have no clues to identify who's responsible of this trash because being the NSA procedures classified material you cannot invite journalists to come over for a tea, nor you can show them logs or anything along that line. I mean how can you demonstrate a federal agency did not spy on someone? It's impossible.

Although this is the major weakness of this whole story, because Republicans cannot demonstrate either that NSA spied on European Citizens. They just hired the usual giant propaganda machine paying it with their huge amount of money. Business as usual: it doesn't matter how much would it cost. It has to be done.

We are here to stand with our bravest men like President Obama and Admiral Alexander because they need to be defended by this smearing campaign which has absolutely no reason to go on.

Because the NSA did not spy on any Foreign leader whatsoever.

E Pluribus Unum

How the “Public” taboo deceived America

In Europe if a maniple of politicians hijacked a whole country and the ransom was Public Health you would see riots in the streets, while in America it is considered “Business as Usual”. 

America is kept in hostage by a maniple of crazy cyborgs who hide themselves behind the flag of the Republican Party and a resuscitated Astroturfed organization called Tea Party, which is clearly sponsored by a private organization whose only interest is annihilating any possible chance the American people get their deserved Healthcare Assistance.

How can it happen that the Land of the Freedom is being hijacked by an obscure Mr. X who is so evil that his personal greed puts at risk the health of 150.000.000 people? 

According to a Harvard Medical School Research Study, about 45.000 people have been dying in America in the past 12 years due to a lack of Healthcare coverage. That means 540.000 people died because they had no health insurance.

In today’s world you can perpetrate a genocide and no media talk about it? How can such an operation can take place while the only reaction is some liberal pundit who talks about “Republican Hypocrisy?” or “GOPs act like kids”?

The answer is Deception, operated through Fear and Pride and the creation of language taboos thanks to an almost infinite budget.

Since the end of World War II, after having defeated the Nazi, America had a new enemy: Communism. Being America the homeland of Business and Capitalism, the Soviet Communist Regime was perceived as pure Evil, or better “the Evil Empire” as Ronald Reagan once said. 

In the 50’s America was fighting the Cold War against Communism, a war that was not fought with conventional means but basically relied on propaganda and clandestine operations and the continuous subsidizing of the various anti-communist governments around the world. Like Pinochet in Chile, Batista in Cuba, Somoza in Nicaragua, Marcos in the Philippines, the Shaw in Iran. All these dictators were sponsored by the U.S. Government to fight against Communist rebels. And that’s just fine.

During 1948-86, military purchases cumulated to $6,316 billion, averaging about $162 billion per year, or 7.6 percent of GNP. To this budget you have to add almost a similar amount for the so called “Black Budget” which is the government's illusory and tangled accounting of what it spends on intelligence gathering, covert operations, and - less noticeably - secret military research and weapons programs. By estimates of those who watch it, the black budget may have hit US$30 billion a year - a figure larger than current federal expenditures for education. 

This budget was used to build up a series of propaganda initiatives to fight Communism, both overseas and domestically where the War on Communism turned into a War against Social justice and the Welfare State. In practice it was a war against the very concept of "poor" and the "cultural" heritage of this enormous effort is what we are witnessing today as the main (non) reasons shown behind the Government shutdown: "We don't want to help you" where "you" is the majority of the American people. 

The money spent during the Cold War for the propaganda against Communism was so enormous that still at today in America, Communism is considered “the worst enemy of the State” like anything that gets slightly close to its meaning.

Still at today you see these people who define themselves “Republicans” raving their meaningless rants against Socialism, Stalinism, Communism, Marxism and so on.

In May of 2009, conservative pollster Frank Luntz released a memo, "The Language of Healthcare 2009: The 10 Rules for Stopping the 'Washington Takeover' of Healthcare." In that memo, Luntz advised conservatives to use phrases like "rationing," "Washington takeover," "government run," "government takeover," and "bailout" when addressing health care reform."The effect of that is that public policy is harmed if the public cannot weigh in intelligently on what is being proposed and what is actually happening"

What do we have to make of all this? simply that Language is important because it's the main disinformation tool when you fight against an enemy using non conventional means. It's called Psychological Warfare.
But the American people is not an enemy you have to deceive! Or not? I mean why Republicans and Fox News should use propaganda and disinformation within the American Audience?

However I ignore how much was the budget at Luntz's disposal, but during 40 years of Cold War the propaganda budget was of almost $10 trillion that has been spent to convince Americans: 1) you can’t trust the government 2) everything that is government-related is Socialist and consequently evil 3) if you claim any entitlement from the government you are a selfish individual who wants to depend on government like a parasite. 

The exploitation of the Cold War budget was meant to completely destroy concepts like “Welfare state”, “Public Service”, “Poverty” and by creating a linguistic taboo zone. 

These words mentioned above became so much of a taboo you couldn’t even name them while in good company.

At the end of the day, what these “people” managed to do was to create a sense of fear among the American people with everything that was “Public” related. In addition whoever was asking for "Public" help or Government help had to feel ashamed. You don't hear many people using the word "Public" Don't ya?

"Public" is an adjective you won’t find in any American news media, no matter how much “liberal” it is, you won’t find it. The few things that pick “Public” as an adjective have negative connotation: “Public School”, “Public Hospital”, “Public Enemy” and “Public Servant” which is the title of those who work for the Federal Government which is the number one enemy of every good American (according to the GOPs).

The American people are so scared about the Government and the concept of Res Publica, that they don’t even know what the concept of “Public” is really about. And I am not talking of uneducated folks or the man from the street. I am talking about educated people like academics and journalists who have been “educated” (read “restrained”) almost to their unconscious level to keep away from everything that might be considered as “public”. So how can they stand for something Public if they are scared of it? They are so much scared that they are not even able to know what the word “Public” means.

When I wrote my article on the new restrictions that were put in place on Facebook, most of my friend’s reactions were along the line “in America we don’t care about Facebook, basically it’s a non-topic!” 

Like if Facebook being a private company has nothing to do with the concept of “Public”. The truth is that when you offer a service to the public, that service becomes a Public Service so it’s not a mere business anymore. So if you put in place new restrictions on a Public Service that’s a restriction you put in place against the public itself. But if you ignore what is public you don’t even know what is "yours". And what you are entitled to.

And that’s exactly what’s happening with the Affordable Care Act, the American people completely ignore to what extent the concept of Public is able to affect your personal sphere.

Indeed still at today the “Public taboo” is worth the money it has been spent for to be in place: 40 years of Propaganda that costed $10 trillion

The greatest of all American taboos is the term “working class”. Back in the 90s, America was still on the economic wave of the former decade, if you did ask around, to every person you knew, you weren't able to find anyone who said “I belong to the working class”. Today neither. I don't think in America you can find many people who claim to belong to the "working class". Because the working class is a communist category which found no place in the Public (again!) imagery.  

Why? Because that’s a taboo that was built with the Cold War money, and what they bought was abolishing the term “Working class” and changing it with the better “Middle Class”, so that people would have felt better, I mean in America we don’t have a working class, we have only Middle Class and the richest 1% of the whole world to which everyone in America one day will belong to. That’s the American Dream!

Indeed the American Dream was injected like heroin within the whole American society so that even the poorest unemployed guy who lives in the Detroit suburb, he would never think of subscribing to a Union and take it to the street. Absolutely not. Because in the collective imagery belonging to a Union it means you are a Communist a subversive, a parasite who wants to be entitled because is a selfish individual. That guy down in Detroit he has to think like a businessman and go get a job and become rich so that other people around him will become rich too, that's altruism! And that’s what you are supposed to do. Get rich or die trying.

In the American public imagery (sorry for the public) or in Hollywood movies there is no hero who belongs to the working class and leads a Trade Union to victory. When you say “Union” in America your mind goes to Jimmy Hoffa, the mafia and his unknown burial site. Hoffa was not a hero, but a corrupted crook. Who would ever be associated with such a dark figure?

Another aspect of this story that doesn’t add up, it’s what is called “Republican hypocrisy”. Last Wednesday because of the government shutdown the Washington Memorial was closed, a few Tea Party cyborgs like Michele Bachmann were able to show up and pull a couple of veteran’s wheelchairs while being photo-op’d.

If those veterans had some blood in their veins they had to refuse the help of those tea-party people but they did not. Instead those veterans were even happy to get together with those cyborgs. They completely forgot that less than a year ago, former Republican candidate Mitt Romney said “time for Veteran’s healthcare to go private”. We want to cut your healthcare but we pull your wheelchair so that we can be portrayed as compassionate cyborgs.

What’s even worse, nobody in the “liberal media” used the Romney’ statement to object against such an awkward move. Actually what happened was that Bill Maher made the greatest mistake ever by saying “nobody said they were the brightest generation”.

No surprise these people are able to hijack the government if the other political side let them do it. 

Indeed it is probably better that Democrats do not respond to such an escalating Brinkmanship strategy. Why? Well because these “people” are willing to bring the conflict to the maximum level, because what they really want is chaos in the streets. 

When the chaos will hit the streets, President Obama will have lost all of its credibility and a new “Order” will be in place, under a new Republican President who will sign a Super Patriot Act where rights and entitlements will be completely cancelled. 

This is the war of the Rich against the (poor) American People and nobody wins.

E Pluribus Unum

GOP’s objective is to kill 45.000 Americans each year

According to a Harvard Medical study, since the year 2000, 45.000 Americans have been dying each year for a lack of healthcare coverage. 

After Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) was signed into law on 2010, Republicans made 42 attempts to repeal the law that aims at saving the lives of these 45.000 and of 150 million Americans who are under-insured within the private healthcare regimen. 

Since the law has been approved, these Republican “patriots” did not accept to save the lives of millions so they kept trying to repeal the law with all of their forces. For 42 times. 

I think the only other organization on this planet that couldn't be more happy of repealing such a crucial lifeline for the American people, is the terrorist network known as “Al Qaeda”, whose main objective has always been to kill as many Americans as possible. 

45.000 people: 15 times the number of casualties of September the 11th. 

The GOP is being doing a better job than Osama Bin Laden himself.

How can a political party call itself  “patriotic” or even "American " whilst trying to repeal a Law that aims at saving the lives of millions of American fellow citizens?

The answer is: it can’t. 

The real paradox is that according to the Brookings Institute, under the private insurance system, the US, federal and state agencies were increasingly involved in healthcare spending, by paying about 45% of the $2.2 trillion the nation has spent on medical care, almost 10 times more of other country governments like Canada, Australia, Japan, France and Italy, which all have a government-funded healthcare. Nonetheless despite the highest spending on the planet, 40% of Americans were not able to receive healthcare assistance. 

The U.S. government spent more on healthcare than on Social Security and national defense combined, while under the Affordable Care Act the government is not only going to save trillions of dollar but probably the law will provide a new boost to the U.S economy because a study in Health Affairs concluded that under the private regulated system, half of personal bankruptcies involved medical bills. You know what that means? That under Obamacare, Americans won't have to worry of getting bankrupt because of their medical bills, they will have more money on their pocket and consequently the economy will recover much quicker.

So a natural question comes into mind: "in whose interest Republicans are acting when they try to repeal the law?" Certainly not in the government’s best interests nor in the American Taxpayer's because the U.S. Government is going to save not billions but Trillions under the new provisions. And for sure Republicans did not act in the interest of the majority of the American people who is uninsured or under-insured.

Let’s see: maybe the interests pursued by the Republican Party in repealing Obamacare is the one of the Private Insurance sector? Maybe, because under the private regimen they made more money, by squeezing the Government subsidy to cure… sorry, not to cure American citizens because of pre-existing conditions...

If that is the case, in practice the Republican Party acted like a contract killer. 

Although what’s even more incredible, is the fact that these “people” they are still considered as legitimate political representatives of the American people.  

Go figure: A bunch of Contract Killers are the Political Representatives of their own victims. They are not happy about having killed 45000 people a year since the year 2000, they want to kill more while being their own political representatives. 

These people's stated objective is to kill more Americans as possible but they want to run the country.

Sounds good.

The subsequent logical question  is: “Who is going to vote Republican at the next elections?”. 

I would really love to know one reason, that is able to explain me why in the world a registered voter would want to vote for the Republicans?  How did they manage to get a double digit result at the latest elections with a mass-killing agenda?

And even more: ”who is going to publicly affirm of being Republican from now on?”

The less dramatic aspect is that since these people have been in business the world has changed and these “people” still haven’t realized how their own situation has changed, which could  be summarized in the sentence “naked in front of a tv camera in world live”. 

In other words, being under the spotlight without being aware of it.

In today’s world, “not only the kings but the whole world is naked”, because if you steal an ice cream in Rome, Mumbai or Wichita, after one second you show up on Facebook and Twitter and every single person on the planet is going to know your name in an instant. 

On the contrary, these “scientists” keep propping up their selfish attitude, like Neanderthals in the Stone Age, without being aware that the whole world is watching them. They think they still are in the XIX century when the only media was the horse. 

However what really amazes me, is the lack of reaction towards these mass-killers. I mean what really confuses me is the fact that traditional media still consider these dregs of society like legitimate people who deserve respect. 

A weird phenomenon is occurring indeed: some independent media, actually fill their daily news stream with the latest “crazy rant” of Glen Beck, Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh or Bill O’ Reilly, like if they were “funny”, because they're raving about social issues while hypocritically invoking religious beliefs, like Satan, the Devil, the bible etc.

This is the saddest aspect of this whole story: the fact that these people are not ditched in the garbage as the scum of society but they still preserve some public dignity because they are considered  “funny”.

It doesn’t matter if they want to kill 45.000 American citizens a year, the “liberal media” call them  “wingnuts” and each of their daily outburst is considered “a joke” and at the end of the day, they are back on track and almost considered “nice people”, or this is what some independent media want us to believe. 

Because these "people" are everything but funny. Last week after having passed the motion to repeal Obamacare for the 42nd time, they were not satisfied and approved a $40 billion food stamps cut, which is the only support of about 150 million Americans.

With 4 out of 5 U.S. Citizens struggling with poverty and joblessness, why a political party would ever want to cut the  basic support of millions of American Families?   

If you look at the general picture, it is enough clear that the real objective of this “Political Party” is not only the one of killing as many Americans as possible, but to keep them in poverty, which in today’s world means keep them in slavery. 

Why in the world a political party would ever will to keep millions of its fellow citizens in a condition of slavery? 

Maybe to exploit them in a much easier way as under-paid workers in Fast Food chains and Wal Marts?  

Just saying. Maybe this is the new economy, the economy of Slavery. 

Sounds good!

I vote Republican because I am an American Patriot!

E Pluribus Unum

GOPs agenda is against Human Rights and Evolution itself

House Republicans passed a bill to cut $40 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) criticized the initiative by saying the cuts will snatch food out of the hands of millions of neediest children and their families."

At the same time House Republicans will vote today on a stopgap spending measure that would defund the Affordable Healthcare for America Act. Its direct consequence would mean 50% of American citizens will be without Healthcare insurance

Why Republicans act like reckless sociopaths with no empathy for their own American fellow citizens?
Why in the civilized world someone would ever want to cut welfare benefits to those in need?

Right after the Affordable Care America Act became the law, the House Republicans made 42 attempts to repeal it. A law that allows 100 millions fellow American citizens to be granted the right to have healthcare assistance. It’s 1/3rd of the U.S. population.

According to a study conducted by Harvard Medical School nearly 45,000 people died in the United States each year since 2000.— One American citizen every 12 minutes -- in large part because they lacked health insurance and could not get appropriate care. 45.000 dead people means 15 times the number of casualties of 9/11 each year.

It’s like having 15 terrorist attacks the size of 9/11 each year. More than one a month. Albeit these dead people have not the same dignity of the 9/11 victims so they don’t’ deserve any attention nor cannot be remembered, celebrated or even mentioned. They deserve no respect.. They didn’t deserve to live and they are completely forgotten once they’re dead. This is more than shameful.

Even more shameful is the way this issue is dealt by the American media and the Political Organizations. Instead of throwing eggs and spit in the face of each Republican expressing his Anti-American view, each day you witness the so called “liberal media” smiling at their lunatic outbursts. In doing so, you tolerate the most basic violation of Human Rights in the country that is supposed to be the first and largest Democracy in the world.

Human Rights must be undisputed. Healthcare assistance is a basic Human Right because it concerns the Human Dignity of each man or woman living on this planet who has the right to be cured.

If we don’t supply 100 million American with basic healthcare we will witness a domestic humanitarian emergency.

In 2009 Remote Area Medical, a non profit medical association that provides free medical care to people in remote areas around the world Remote organized a free healthcare session in Los Angeles in August 11 at the Inglewood forum where the medical staff have met with 14,561 patient encounters. Matt Hendrickson, a doctor working for RAM spoke to Italian journalist Daniela Roveda:"I have worked in the worst world areas and I never thought one day I would have provided assistance right here in the United States."

                                                     

 

It was not Damascus or Mumbai, it was Los Angeles, California where an estimated 8 million people are today out of the healthcare coverage”.

This is not a political matter anymore, this is a Human Rigths emergency and it belongs to the basic ethical spectrum.Whoever allows this to happen has to be treated like the worst enemy of  the American People.

Tomas and MadolineTuba hold their son John, 8, while waiting 
on a sidewalk for tickets into a free health clinic on August 13, 2009 

in Inglewood, California. Tuba, a department manager at a grocery 

store, said he has health insurance but cannot afford the co-pay fees
for medical procedures for his family. 

You can't have a democracy if a political party represents Corporation rights and the other one represents Human Rights. It just can't work out. The people's interests concern Human Life which is the most sacred good on earth and consequently it must always be represented. The Republican Party does not represent the interests of the American people, it represents the interests of Corporate America and they consider Human life at the same level of material objects. How can such an organization be tolerated within a country whose flag is the world’s landmark of Democracy?

Where is political representation? Whose interests represent the Republican Party? Why the American People tolerate the existence of the GOP being the worst enemy of the American people’s health?

You can’t put human life and material objects on the same level because this is how reckless sociopath and criminals see the world. In practice the very existence of the Republican Party is an hymn to criminal behavior. As long as this issue is not questioned under the moral and the ethical point of view there won't be Democracy in America.

The GOP’s main objection is “Where do you think the money to run the country comes from?”

Alicia P.Melis, a researcher from Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, in Germany went to Ngamba Island in Uganda to study chimpanzee behavior.

In the wild, chimps are not in an evolution process because of their selfish attitude, a sort of natural instinct that push them to “exploit” their fellows to achieve food and not to share it. The experiment consisted of two chimps in a cage and food put in front of them outside of the cage. A rope passes along a wood stick where the food is. In order to get the food the chimp needs the help of his fellow. He calls his fellow and they cooperate to get the food. That’s intelligence. However when they get it if this is not enough for both of them, only the alpha fellow between the two get to eat. The second time the food is put on the stick the second fellow do not cooperate because he knows he won’t get any reward. This is where evolution arrests for chimpanzees.

And this is the exact same destiny we are going to share with the chimps if we allow this primitive behavior not only to exist but to lead the world. Selfishness stops evolution. Can you hear me?

Selfishness attitude won’t ever help a civilization to move forward as a whole. We are missing a main point here that is called Oneness. Before Religion, here on this planet we, as a civilization we should act like a single person, a single consciousness. That’s the very beginning of real Human Evolution.

The GOP’s agenda instead is not only against human rights but aims at leading our world back to the Stone Age. 

Good Luck Everybody!

E Pluribus Unum