Artificial Intelligence is a scam to keep us away from Conscious Technology

"sin vida no hay conciencia, sin conciencia no hay vida"


I decided to write this story after having seen a series of tweets of the same article about South African Entrepreneur Elon Musk announcing to sponsor a research on Artificial Intelligence.

Humans have been pursuing the quest for "artificial intelligence" since Czech writer Karel Čapek published his play Rossum's Universal Robots in 1920.  

According to John McCarthy, Artificial Intelligence is "the science and engineering of making intelligent machines".

Unfortunately machines won't ever be able to become intelligent because intelligence requires Consciousness and a machine doesn't have Consciousness nor you can implant Consciousness into a machine, hence you have to start over from the other way round, that means you first need Conscious material which means living biological material to develop any technology that can be defined as such. Conscious material is any living biological tissue that has a frequency which can be aligned with ours. Conscious Technology is all about this: FREQUENCY ALIGNEMENT between two living beings.

That's why when you deal with this subject you must talk of Conscious Technology and not of artificial intelligence which is absolutely a meaningless expression.  

Artificial intelligence is an oxymoron as Intelligence is Consciousness and Consciousness can't be "artificial" otherwise it couldn't be "Conscious". 

As a matter of fact, for the reason explained in this article, when the media show a future technological scenario it's always about robots and cyborgs and we have been presented with this narrative a million times since 1920.

In practice Artificial Intelligence is robotics. The only problem with this path is that it is completely wrong because as I said you have to start from the biological side and not from the machine or the software because software and machines are made of dead material and they cannot become conscious because they are not "living".

Consciousness is like Parmenides concept of being: "what is is, and what is not cannot be" in other words nothing comes from nothing and Artificial Intelligence is nothing. 

As I said if we want to talk about real technological evolution we must approach this matter from the opposite way, that means if you really want to step into the future in terms of technology you must approach the matter of Consciousness, which still at today for our "official science" represents a total mystery and here ends our quest for technological advancement because everything "Conscious" is absolutely taboo for the official science of this planet.

Indeed our "official science" is still stuck where it was two hundred years ago at the double slit experiment, as scientists from planet earth still claim that Quantum Mechanics can only be applied at level of atoms and photons, as according to classical physics everything Quantum is still "inexplicable".

I repeat it once again just in case you didn't get it:

Classical physics defines Quantum Physics inexplicable.  

Why in the world Quantum Physics would be "inexplicable"?

Quantum Physics was discovered more than two hundred years ago when in 1803 Thomas Young performed the famous double-slit experiment. That experiment revealed for the first time the role of Consciousness as the ground state of physics. Although for obvious reasons official science has been vehemently denying such role to this day. Why? Because powers that be cannot acknowledge Consciousness as the basis of the whole Universe as the world's institutions would instantly crumble on themselves. 

For these reasons, official science is forcely stuck in its Neanderthalian materialistic mentality that the physical universe exists as it presents itself, even if Quantum Physics undermined the very notion of physical objects at its foundation, as the universe is not solid, tangible, or fixed, because it's based upon Consciousness. 

Therefore even if the old science of an "external" physical universe has been mortally wounded by quantum physics, official science is persisting in its state of denial and that's why it keeps talking of such nonsense as "artificial intelligence" and cyborgs, because such dystopic vision is coherent with their denial of Consciousness. 

You may easily grasp that if official science denies the role of Consciousness we can't make any meaningful step forward in terms of technology as it would be like building a ship whilst denying the existence of water. 

In other words for a real technological leap we should swap technology with Consciousness as these two words are synonyms somehow, as there's no technological device more powerful and more advanced than Consciousness itself.

Such a comparison gets more meaningful if you consider that Consciousness is the very essence of the multiverse in which we live, as everything that compose the wholeness is Consciousness.

As Deepak Chopra said: "Consciousness is fundamental and without cause. It is the ground state of existence. As conscious beings, humans cannot experience measure or conceive of a reality devoid of consciousness."

If that's the situation, why science still denies the existence of Consciousness and its crucial role in technological advancement? 

Because one thing is absolutely certain: if we don't take Consciousness as the starting point of any future technology we'll stay where we are stuck right now: in the darkness.

The Arms industry might be one of the reason why Consciousness is still a taboo:

in an op-ed appeared in The Independent in 2014 Stephen Hawking wrote: “Success in creating Artificial Intelligence would be the biggest event in human history, unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks...in the near term, world militaries are considering autonomous-weapon systems that can choose and eliminate targets.”

That's it. In this statement not only Hawkings keeps consciousness out of artificial intelligence but it also denies its very meaning at its roots as he defines a weapon system autonomous but dangerous. 
Why an autonomous system should be dangerous? well because it's not conscious.....and if it's not conscious that means it cannot be intelligent either....

Unfortunately for Mr. Hawking and for the military, if you start developing conscious technology you have to stand for Consciousness, that means the whole purpose of development, application and scope of the project must be respectful of the essence of Consciousness which is life. 

You can't use a living fabric for something that is not righteous in its objective. For example if you build a weapon that is conscious, that weapon won't ever shoot for the wrong reason. That's why Conscious Tech can't be developed on this planet at this time as our civilisation has been distinguishing itself for being sociopath in nature. Murder, war, violence is everyday business on this planet and our governments still rule by fear and terror which is just the opposite of  what Consciousness is.

Can you imagine earthling researchers developing a technology that has not belligerent application but its opposite?

Can you imagine the military industrial complex engaged in developing something that excludes the possibility of killing or harming someone as a preset setting? or even worse, a technology that will instantly vaporize any human fear? Not in this space-time.

Fear is the most important tool for the elite ruling this planet, if it vanishes for good that would be the end of their ruling.

On the other side this adversion for Consciousness and the adoration of fear are absolutely coherent with the pursue of artificial intelligence which is the denial of Consciousness.

In the past few years a series of dystopyan scenarios have been forecasted by a number of news articles warning on the dangers of artificial intelligence like a possible "Rise of the Machines". 

Fear.

It is kind of interesting to notice that those forecasting a possible disastrous outcome from AI are the very same people who are actually working on the development of Artificial Intelligence, including that genius of Mr. Elon Musk.

Mr. Musk is the guy who is the lead investor of this amazing futuristic technology, together with a number of other enthusiastic Silicon Valley investors who I don't think would be that happy when they'll find out that by investing in AI they simply wasted their money. 

I don't think either that Silicon Valley entrepreneurs are that silly to invest in a Ponzi scheme like AI and that's why I am 100% positive this research is just a big hoax for the press and a further distraction for the sleeping Consciousness of the silent majority.

The cover up on Conscious Technology is so intense that they are using every mean to disinform people on this matter. I just found this article published by nothing less than The World Economic Forum, whose headline goes "What is Conscious Technology?" but if you read the article it doesn't explains Conscious Technology  but it talks about the artificial intelligence and other nonsensical stuff like unspecified dangerous threats awaiting ahead of us. It really makes no sense especially for a supposed prestigious media like the WEF. 

On the other side I have found someone who really grasped what Conscious Technology means and that's Dr. Rachel Armstrong, who talks about "living architecture", "living spaceships" and this is exactly what I mean when I talk about Conscious Technology.

However with this piece I just wanted to let you know that artificial intelligence is the usual nonsense provided to you by our official science only to keep yourself away from Consciousness (did I just write that?).

It might sound paradoxical but this scheme is actually been working big time if you consider that official science was able to downgrade quantum physics to a minor rank of study and managed to keep it stuck at the same level it had when it started in 1804 and that's 200 years ago. Being able to keep something invisible for 200 years it means either you're Houdini or you have a crowd of narcolexic people.

The official science can be pretty confident to make you believe that artificial intelligence is the new thing and that its development can carry dangerous consequences to humankind. As I said before  intelligence cannot be "artificial" and by consequence if you call "intelligent" something that is not then you are in trouble. Because "intelligent" indicates someone that can make autonomous independent decisions and this is the lie, because no conscious entity could ever make autonomous, independent decisions. If you consider that AI is applied to military technology, that's the formula for disaster.

However the problem of Conscious Technology is that being the ONLY way to technological advancement it would be impossible for our civilization to take that direction because our world is based upon fake values like money, fear and work (read slavery) which are just the opposite of Consciousness, hence we still have a long way to go before we would get even close to Conscious Tech. 

For the moment, just keep in mind that the only way to Evolution is the Evolution of Consciousness.

E Pluribus Unum