Artificial Intelligence is a scam to keep us away from Conscious Technology

"sin vida no hay conciencia, sin conciencia no hay vida"


I decided to write this story after having seen a series of tweets of the same article about South African Entrepreneur Elon Musk announcing to sponsor a research on Artificial Intelligence.

Humans have been pursuing the quest for "artificial intelligence" since Czech writer Karel Čapek published his play Rossum's Universal Robots in 1920.  

According to John McCarthy, Artificial Intelligence is "the science and engineering of making intelligent machines".

Unfortunately machines won't ever be able to become intelligent because intelligence requires Consciousness and a machine doesn't have Consciousness nor you can implant Consciousness into a machine, hence you have to start over from the other way round, that means you first need Conscious material which means living biological material to develop any technology that can be defined as such. Conscious material is any living biological tissue that has a frequency which can be aligned with ours. Conscious Technology is all about this: FREQUENCY ALIGNEMENT between two living beings.

That's why when you deal with this subject you must talk of Conscious Technology and not of artificial intelligence which is absolutely a meaningless expression.  

Artificial intelligence is an oxymoron as Intelligence is Consciousness and Consciousness can't be "artificial" otherwise it couldn't be "Conscious". 

As a matter of fact, for the reason explained in this article, when the media show a future technological scenario it's always about robots and cyborgs and we have been presented with this narrative a million times since 1920.

In practice Artificial Intelligence is robotics. The only problem with this path is that it is completely wrong because as I said you have to start from the biological side and not from the machine or the software because software and machines are made of dead material and they cannot become conscious because they are not "living".

Consciousness is like Parmenides concept of being: "what is is, and what is not cannot be" in other words nothing comes from nothing and Artificial Intelligence is nothing. 

As I said if we want to talk about real technological evolution we must approach this matter from the opposite way, that means if you really want to step into the future in terms of technology you must approach the matter of Consciousness, which still at today for our "official science" represents a total mystery and here ends our quest for technological advancement because everything "Conscious" is absolutely taboo for the official science of this planet.

Indeed our "official science" is still stuck where it was two hundred years ago at the double slit experiment, as scientists from planet earth still claim that Quantum Mechanics can only be applied at level of atoms and photons, as according to classical physics everything Quantum is still "inexplicable".

I repeat it once again just in case you didn't get it:

Classical physics defines Quantum Physics inexplicable.  

Why in the world Quantum Physics would be "inexplicable"?

Quantum Physics was discovered more than two hundred years ago when in 1803 Thomas Young performed the famous double-slit experiment. That experiment revealed for the first time the role of Consciousness as the ground state of physics. Although for obvious reasons official science has been vehemently denying such role to this day. Why? Because powers that be cannot acknowledge Consciousness as the basis of the whole Universe as the world's institutions would instantly crumble on themselves. 

For these reasons, official science is forcely stuck in its Neanderthalian materialistic mentality that the physical universe exists as it presents itself, even if Quantum Physics undermined the very notion of physical objects at its foundation, as the universe is not solid, tangible, or fixed, because it's based upon Consciousness. 

Therefore even if the old science of an "external" physical universe has been mortally wounded by quantum physics, official science is persisting in its state of denial and that's why it keeps talking of such nonsense as "artificial intelligence" and cyborgs, because such dystopic vision is coherent with their denial of Consciousness. 

You may easily grasp that if official science denies the role of Consciousness we can't make any meaningful step forward in terms of technology as it would be like building a ship whilst denying the existence of water. 

In other words for a real technological leap we should swap technology with Consciousness as these two words are synonyms somehow, as there's no technological device more powerful and more advanced than Consciousness itself.

Such a comparison gets more meaningful if you consider that Consciousness is the very essence of the multiverse in which we live, as everything that compose the wholeness is Consciousness.

As Deepak Chopra said: "Consciousness is fundamental and without cause. It is the ground state of existence. As conscious beings, humans cannot experience measure or conceive of a reality devoid of consciousness."

If that's the situation, why science still denies the existence of Consciousness and its crucial role in technological advancement? 

Because one thing is absolutely certain: if we don't take Consciousness as the starting point of any future technology we'll stay where we are stuck right now: in the darkness.

The Arms industry might be one of the reason why Consciousness is still a taboo:

in an op-ed appeared in The Independent in 2014 Stephen Hawking wrote: “Success in creating Artificial Intelligence would be the biggest event in human history, unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks...in the near term, world militaries are considering autonomous-weapon systems that can choose and eliminate targets.”

That's it. In this statement not only Hawkings keeps consciousness out of artificial intelligence but it also denies its very meaning at its roots as he defines a weapon system autonomous but dangerous. 
Why an autonomous system should be dangerous? well because it's not conscious.....and if it's not conscious that means it cannot be intelligent either....

Unfortunately for Mr. Hawking and for the military, if you start developing conscious technology you have to stand for Consciousness, that means the whole purpose of development, application and scope of the project must be respectful of the essence of Consciousness which is life. 

You can't use a living fabric for something that is not righteous in its objective. For example if you build a weapon that is conscious, that weapon won't ever shoot for the wrong reason. That's why Conscious Tech can't be developed on this planet at this time as our civilisation has been distinguishing itself for being sociopath in nature. Murder, war, violence is everyday business on this planet and our governments still rule by fear and terror which is just the opposite of  what Consciousness is.

Can you imagine earthling researchers developing a technology that has not belligerent application but its opposite?

Can you imagine the military industrial complex engaged in developing something that excludes the possibility of killing or harming someone as a preset setting? or even worse, a technology that will instantly vaporize any human fear? Not in this space-time.

Fear is the most important tool for the elite ruling this planet, if it vanishes for good that would be the end of their ruling.

On the other side this adversion for Consciousness and the adoration of fear are absolutely coherent with the pursue of artificial intelligence which is the denial of Consciousness.

In the past few years a series of dystopyan scenarios have been forecasted by a number of news articles warning on the dangers of artificial intelligence like a possible "Rise of the Machines". 

Fear.

It is kind of interesting to notice that those forecasting a possible disastrous outcome from AI are the very same people who are actually working on the development of Artificial Intelligence, including that genius of Mr. Elon Musk.

Mr. Musk is the guy who is the lead investor of this amazing futuristic technology, together with a number of other enthusiastic Silicon Valley investors who I don't think would be that happy when they'll find out that by investing in AI they simply wasted their money. 

I don't think either that Silicon Valley entrepreneurs are that silly to invest in a Ponzi scheme like AI and that's why I am 100% positive this research is just a big hoax for the press and a further distraction for the sleeping Consciousness of the silent majority.

The cover up on Conscious Technology is so intense that they are using every mean to disinform people on this matter. I just found this article published by nothing less than The World Economic Forum, whose headline goes "What is Conscious Technology?" but if you read the article it doesn't explains Conscious Technology  but it talks about the artificial intelligence and other nonsensical stuff like unspecified dangerous threats awaiting ahead of us. It really makes no sense especially for a supposed prestigious media like the WEF. 

On the other side I have found someone who really grasped what Conscious Technology means and that's Dr. Rachel Armstrong, who talks about "living architecture", "living spaceships" and this is exactly what I mean when I talk about Conscious Technology.

However with this piece I just wanted to let you know that artificial intelligence is the usual nonsense provided to you by our official science only to keep yourself away from Consciousness (did I just write that?).

It might sound paradoxical but this scheme is actually been working big time if you consider that official science was able to downgrade quantum physics to a minor rank of study and managed to keep it stuck at the same level it had when it started in 1804 and that's 200 years ago. Being able to keep something invisible for 200 years it means either you're Houdini or you have a crowd of narcolexic people.

The official science can be pretty confident to make you believe that artificial intelligence is the new thing and that its development can carry dangerous consequences to humankind. As I said before  intelligence cannot be "artificial" and by consequence if you call "intelligent" something that is not then you are in trouble. Because "intelligent" indicates someone that can make autonomous independent decisions and this is the lie, because no conscious entity could ever make autonomous, independent decisions. If you consider that AI is applied to military technology, that's the formula for disaster.

However the problem of Conscious Technology is that being the ONLY way to technological advancement it would be impossible for our civilization to take that direction because our world is based upon fake values like money, fear and work (read slavery) which are just the opposite of Consciousness, hence we still have a long way to go before we would get even close to Conscious Tech. 

For the moment, just keep in mind that the only way to Evolution is the Evolution of Consciousness.

E Pluribus Unum

Forget about Left vs. Right, today it's Consciousness vs. Sociopathy

If we look back into the history of our civilization we see that the past 2000 years have been characterized by a constant struggle between Consciousness and Sociopathy. 

A dynamic process that still goes on today. First of all we need to define these two forces, which basically represent two opposite system of values: Consciousness is the vital breath that defines everything we perceive with or without the help of our senses. 

Consciousness is perception and creation at the same time. It's the force that keeps the Universe together and its nature is omnipresent and it goes beyond the restriction of space-time, even if the Double Slit experiment by Thomas Young  dates back to 1801.  

The Conscious vision is based upon unity and inclusiveness, whose main implication is that the whole universe is based upon the concept of Oneness.

Sociopathy, on the other hand, is the Neanderthalian attitude that considers reality as something external from ourselves, as if matter would stand alone or as if it is made of something that doesn't include ourselves and that does instead exist a priori.

Without Consciousness, there is no physical matter and this is not an opinion, this is the Law of Physics.

The perfect metaphor and the maximum expression of sociopathy is religion, which is based upon the concept that an almighty being external to our own Consciousness it is superior to us in terms of knowledge, vision and is perfect by nature and this supposed external entity is ruling and controlling everything we do.

Religion was born when the Neanderthals who walked this planet were misled by their own Consciousness vibrations and they ascribed it to an external element rather than internal and they called it god. 

Basically we can affirm that Sociopathy is based upon the concept of division instead of unity. 

Sociopathy is division. Where you have someone who wants to divide society into categories of any sort you have a sociopath attitude. Meaningless categories like political affiliation, race, ethnic origin, wealth, gender, sexual orientation, nationality or religion were created and are still being propped up in today's world with the only intent of dividing our society in order to better rule it. This is a ruling strategy that the current establishment borrowed from the Romans and which is called "divide et impera" (divide and rule). 

During the past two thousand years we have been witnessing alternatively the rise and fall of Consciousness and Sociopathy. At the end of the Roman Republic the laws that gave patricians exclusive rights to Rome's highest offices were repealed or weakened by a Conscious attitude that led plebeian families who became full members of the aristocracy. Eventually Rome was hit by a sociopath attitude that took over and Rome became an Empire which was the first step towards its decline. 

Under Emperor Constantine, Christianism became the official religion and religion became the most powerful tool in terms of sociopathy, because it messes with consciousness, Religion took over and the Roman Empire collapsed because the Roman Consciousness collapsed too. After the fall of the Roman Empire we saw Religion taking over the world through a policy of total subjugation of both religious and non religious people. The Sociopathy of the Middle Ages ended with the Renaissance when the human being was put back on the center of the world. The city-state of Firenze became the cultural center of the world, as its wealth prospered along with the production of its Art which is the highest form of Consciousness projection. 

Everything went well until the sociopath Counter Reformation kicked in. Then Consciousness was back with the French Revolution but then again the sociopath Bourbon Restoration occurred.
Luckily however it wasn't able to reverse all the changes made by the French Revolution. Consciousness resisted but the resistance made by the establishment was extremely tough. Sociopathy reached its peak of success during the XX century that was the century in which the sociopath attitude of dividing the world reached its top. 

They started by dividing society in classes and by separating people based on their wealth, their social status, then with the coming of Nazism and the Holocaust they introduced racism to further divide society within itself based on skin color and ethnic origin. By creating a huge injury such as the Holocaust, the establishment was able to create an infinite state of resentment that was able to cross generation after generation and that carried with it an enormous hatred even against people's ancestors who died decades earlier. 

Perpetuating hate is what the sociopath likes the most because hate keeps up social divisions and by fuelling that ressentment over the years they can rule smoothly and without being bothered. That was the plan, but luckily in the past twenty years, thanks to the development of the information technology, Consciousness had a major chance of letting people understand that there is no left and right and that the world's problems are a common challenge for us all, starting with the environment issue, which is a problem that affects our world beyond national boundaries. Hence, ain't no left and right because if you acknowledge our civilization has a problem with the environment you're a conscious being while if you deny it you can only be a sociopath. 

As for Sociopath we mean here someone who lacks empathy, someone who is blind and doesn't allow his/her Consciousness to express itself. If you prop up meaningless categories like race, political affiliation, sexual orientation or gender issues, despite the position or side you might take within any kind of conflict, you are playing by the sociopath rules and you're propping up their illusionary game whose only aim is distracting yourself from the real issue which is that we are being constantly manipulated by an establishment whose only goal is keeping its strict control over us all. 

Wherever there's a war or terrorism or any possible kind of conflict on any area of the planet that's where the sociopath establishment tries to divide our society. If you stand for war you are a sociopath, it doesn't matter if you were provoked or there was an inciting incident. War is Sociopathy at work. The sociopath establishment prospers in chaos and wherever you have a situation of chaos there you also have a sociopath attitude of taking control through the divide and rule imperative. The sociopath establishment wants the chaos - as chaos creates division and division creates conflict which leads to violence and everything that comes with it. 

Being a sociopath means creating a world bank protocol that raises the bank's capital reserve while introducing a customer rating system. These two measures would stop any economic system from working as banks stop extending credit to mid-sized businesses and average consumers. Meanwhile with the same protocol you allow banks to supply money only to those companies that also have a huge capital reserve and a continuous cash flow. Families and mid-sized businesses are spurred to plunge into debts and there you have a situation of economic chaos which leads to social tensions, social divisions and social conflict. 

This kind of situation usually leads to growing of political extremism, the rise of xenophobic groups and all sort of conflicts based upon non-existing divisions. The protocols I have just mentioned are Basel II that was issued on June 2004 and that caused the financial crisis of 2008 and Basel III which was approved in 2010 and they both have been issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision which is composed by the Group of Ten. The Group of Ten or G-10 refers to the group of countries that have agreed to participate in the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB). The GAB was established in 1962, when the governments of eight International Monetary Fund (IMF) members—Belgium, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States—and the central banks of two others, Germany and Sweden In general the sociopath attitude is trying to subjugate the world's population under a global state of chaos and instability while introducing an umbrella of rules issued by a power elite that nobody elected. 

Wherever you have a global organization there you also have the sociopathic attitude of controlling people and keep a tight rein on them in order to prevent them from being serene and peaceful otherwise they would be able to become aware of the state of slavery in which we all live. Keeping the world in a permanent state of alert and economic struggle prevents people from expanding their Consciousness and becoming aware about what Life is really meant for. That's why if you are the elite that wants to keep the people of this planet in a state of subjugation you must create a state of chaos, throughout economic instability and fake divisions. Why? Because if otherwise you let the people become aware of how better they could live without this state of subjugation, your power will vanish like snow under the sun. Since this is the state of the art, being a sociopath means pretending to ignore that we are being manipulated throughout an illusionary game of good versus evil, left versus right, world versus terrorism, which is being staged by the establishment for its own entertainment and our own subjugation. 

Being a Conscious person it means you stop pretending to ignore you are being constantly manipulated and you start express your greatest indignation for the illusionary world in which they want us to live. What the sociopath elite that is convinced to control this planet doesn't know, is that Consciousness is the real ruler and you can nothing against it because aint' no higher power other than Consciousness. And because Consciousness always prevails, if you act against it and you keep up your sociopathic attitude of creating conflicts and divisions, since the whole Universe is a projection of Consciousness your sociopath projection will inevitably lead to your own disintegration.  

That's why the environmental problem that you call global warming is not actually global warming but it is rather your sociopathic projection that is backfiring on yourself and that is disintegrating the world as you know it because as you do not know, what you call "world" or "reality" is instead a projection of your own Consciousness and if you are a sociopath your projection won't last dude and you will be completely disintegrated along with your own non-projection and you will end in a no-time zone. 

Your destiny is to vanish dear sociopath, since in a little while, sooner than you might even imagine this time-string in which you think you live it will be splitted in two separate time-dimensions and you will stay here stuck in a continuous conflict-stricken world while Conscious beings will join a higher conscious time-string in which you will neither be allowed to enter nor even to see. 

Good Bye Sociopath!!! 

E Pluribus Unum