Forget about Left vs. Right, today it's Consciousness vs. Sociopathy

If we look back into the history of our civilization we see that the past 2000 years have been characterized by a constant struggle between Consciousness and Sociopathy. 

A dynamic process that still goes on today. First of all we need to define these two forces, which basically represent two opposite system of values: Consciousness is the vital breath that defines everything we perceive with or without the help of our senses. 

Consciousness is perception and creation at the same time. It's the force that keeps the Universe together and its nature is omnipresent and it goes beyond the restriction of space-time, even if the Double Slit experiment by Thomas Young  dates back to 1801.  

The Conscious vision is based upon unity and inclusiveness, whose main implication is that the whole universe is based upon the concept of Oneness.

Sociopathy, on the other hand, is the Neanderthalian attitude that considers reality as something external from ourselves, as if matter would stand alone or as if it is made of something that doesn't include ourselves and that does instead exist a priori.

Without Consciousness, there is no physical matter and this is not an opinion, this is the Law of Physics.

The perfect metaphor and the maximum expression of sociopathy is religion, which is based upon the concept that an almighty being external to our own Consciousness it is superior to us in terms of knowledge, vision and is perfect by nature and this supposed external entity is ruling and controlling everything we do.

Religion was born when the Neanderthals who walked this planet were misled by their own Consciousness vibrations and they ascribed it to an external element rather than internal and they called it god. 

Basically we can affirm that Sociopathy is based upon the concept of division instead of unity. 

Sociopathy is division. Where you have someone who wants to divide society into categories of any sort you have a sociopath attitude. Meaningless categories like political affiliation, race, ethnic origin, wealth, gender, sexual orientation, nationality or religion were created and are still being propped up in today's world with the only intent of dividing our society in order to better rule it. This is a ruling strategy that the current establishment borrowed from the Romans and which is called "divide et impera" (divide and rule). 

During the past two thousand years we have been witnessing alternatively the rise and fall of Consciousness and Sociopathy. At the end of the Roman Republic the laws that gave patricians exclusive rights to Rome's highest offices were repealed or weakened by a Conscious attitude that led plebeian families who became full members of the aristocracy. Eventually Rome was hit by a sociopath attitude that took over and Rome became an Empire which was the first step towards its decline. 

Under Emperor Constantine, Christianism became the official religion and religion became the most powerful tool in terms of sociopathy, because it messes with consciousness, Religion took over and the Roman Empire collapsed because the Roman Consciousness collapsed too. After the fall of the Roman Empire we saw Religion taking over the world through a policy of total subjugation of both religious and non religious people. The Sociopathy of the Middle Ages ended with the Renaissance when the human being was put back on the center of the world. The city-state of Firenze became the cultural center of the world, as its wealth prospered along with the production of its Art which is the highest form of Consciousness projection. 

Everything went well until the sociopath Counter Reformation kicked in. Then Consciousness was back with the French Revolution but then again the sociopath Bourbon Restoration occurred.
Luckily however it wasn't able to reverse all the changes made by the French Revolution. Consciousness resisted but the resistance made by the establishment was extremely tough. Sociopathy reached its peak of success during the XX century that was the century in which the sociopath attitude of dividing the world reached its top. 

They started by dividing society in classes and by separating people based on their wealth, their social status, then with the coming of Nazism and the Holocaust they introduced racism to further divide society within itself based on skin color and ethnic origin. By creating a huge injury such as the Holocaust, the establishment was able to create an infinite state of resentment that was able to cross generation after generation and that carried with it an enormous hatred even against people's ancestors who died decades earlier. 

Perpetuating hate is what the sociopath likes the most because hate keeps up social divisions and by fuelling that ressentment over the years they can rule smoothly and without being bothered. That was the plan, but luckily in the past twenty years, thanks to the development of the information technology, Consciousness had a major chance of letting people understand that there is no left and right and that the world's problems are a common challenge for us all, starting with the environment issue, which is a problem that affects our world beyond national boundaries. Hence, ain't no left and right because if you acknowledge our civilization has a problem with the environment you're a conscious being while if you deny it you can only be a sociopath. 

As for Sociopath we mean here someone who lacks empathy, someone who is blind and doesn't allow his/her Consciousness to express itself. If you prop up meaningless categories like race, political affiliation, sexual orientation or gender issues, despite the position or side you might take within any kind of conflict, you are playing by the sociopath rules and you're propping up their illusionary game whose only aim is distracting yourself from the real issue which is that we are being constantly manipulated by an establishment whose only goal is keeping its strict control over us all. 

Wherever there's a war or terrorism or any possible kind of conflict on any area of the planet that's where the sociopath establishment tries to divide our society. If you stand for war you are a sociopath, it doesn't matter if you were provoked or there was an inciting incident. War is Sociopathy at work. The sociopath establishment prospers in chaos and wherever you have a situation of chaos there you also have a sociopath attitude of taking control through the divide and rule imperative. The sociopath establishment wants the chaos - as chaos creates division and division creates conflict which leads to violence and everything that comes with it. 

Being a sociopath means creating a world bank protocol that raises the bank's capital reserve while introducing a customer rating system. These two measures would stop any economic system from working as banks stop extending credit to mid-sized businesses and average consumers. Meanwhile with the same protocol you allow banks to supply money only to those companies that also have a huge capital reserve and a continuous cash flow. Families and mid-sized businesses are spurred to plunge into debts and there you have a situation of economic chaos which leads to social tensions, social divisions and social conflict. 

This kind of situation usually leads to growing of political extremism, the rise of xenophobic groups and all sort of conflicts based upon non-existing divisions. The protocols I have just mentioned are Basel II that was issued on June 2004 and that caused the financial crisis of 2008 and Basel III which was approved in 2010 and they both have been issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision which is composed by the Group of Ten. The Group of Ten or G-10 refers to the group of countries that have agreed to participate in the General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB). The GAB was established in 1962, when the governments of eight International Monetary Fund (IMF) members—Belgium, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States—and the central banks of two others, Germany and Sweden In general the sociopath attitude is trying to subjugate the world's population under a global state of chaos and instability while introducing an umbrella of rules issued by a power elite that nobody elected. 

Wherever you have a global organization there you also have the sociopathic attitude of controlling people and keep a tight rein on them in order to prevent them from being serene and peaceful otherwise they would be able to become aware of the state of slavery in which we all live. Keeping the world in a permanent state of alert and economic struggle prevents people from expanding their Consciousness and becoming aware about what Life is really meant for. That's why if you are the elite that wants to keep the people of this planet in a state of subjugation you must create a state of chaos, throughout economic instability and fake divisions. Why? Because if otherwise you let the people become aware of how better they could live without this state of subjugation, your power will vanish like snow under the sun. Since this is the state of the art, being a sociopath means pretending to ignore that we are being manipulated throughout an illusionary game of good versus evil, left versus right, world versus terrorism, which is being staged by the establishment for its own entertainment and our own subjugation. 

Being a Conscious person it means you stop pretending to ignore you are being constantly manipulated and you start express your greatest indignation for the illusionary world in which they want us to live. What the sociopath elite that is convinced to control this planet doesn't know, is that Consciousness is the real ruler and you can nothing against it because aint' no higher power other than Consciousness. And because Consciousness always prevails, if you act against it and you keep up your sociopathic attitude of creating conflicts and divisions, since the whole Universe is a projection of Consciousness your sociopath projection will inevitably lead to your own disintegration.  

That's why the environmental problem that you call global warming is not actually global warming but it is rather your sociopathic projection that is backfiring on yourself and that is disintegrating the world as you know it because as you do not know, what you call "world" or "reality" is instead a projection of your own Consciousness and if you are a sociopath your projection won't last dude and you will be completely disintegrated along with your own non-projection and you will end in a no-time zone. 

Your destiny is to vanish dear sociopath, since in a little while, sooner than you might even imagine this time-string in which you think you live it will be splitted in two separate time-dimensions and you will stay here stuck in a continuous conflict-stricken world while Conscious beings will join a higher conscious time-string in which you will neither be allowed to enter nor even to see. 

Good Bye Sociopath!!! 

E Pluribus Unum

Italy's Curse: The Lust for Revenge

Only a week after former US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner revealed in his book that back in 2011 EU officials approached him with a plan to overthrow Silvio Berlusconi, Italy’s elected leader, another assumed "international plot" has been revealed by the leader of Italy’s Five Star Movement, Gianroberto Caseleggio:

(the text reported below is an abstract from a video interview to Mr. Casaleggio conducted by Il fatto Quotidiano Editor Marco Travaglio)

"It was April 10, 2013, a week before Italy's Presidential Elections. I was with Mr. Grillo (The Five Star Movement leader) and two of our staff members.

The British Ambassador asked us if we would like to meet Enrico Letta, who at the time was Vice-Secretary of the Democratic Party and who was waiting in the next room. 

We turned down the offer. 

Eventually we were taken upstairs via a backstair to have lunch with some of the Embassy staff while the Ambassador was having lunch with Mr. Letta downstairs. 

At one point the Ambassador (rather his right-hand man) asked us: "What do you think of the re-election of Mr. Napolitano? (The incumbent President of the Republic) 

Two weeks later Napolitano was re-elected President and Mr. Letta was named Prime Minister. We reached the conclusion that there was something wrong in all this . . .

It proves the strong influence that foreign governments have on Italy's political choices. 

It's not just Germany. It's one of the many faces of our total loss of sovereignty: we lost territorial sovereignity in 1945; we lost monetary sovereignty with the Euro and the fiscal sovereignty with the fiscal compact. In order to win the elections we should win the elections in at least three foreign countries...."

Italians tend too easily to forget that from 1923 to 1943 Italy was ruled by a ferocious fascist dictatorship which was Hitler's first ally.

Much has been said about the existence of secret treaties that would see the World War II winners as Italy's democracy supervisors but like every conspiracy theory there is no conclusive evidence that such treaties do exist.  

Even if that were the case, you have to see the situation within the setting of 1943, when Italy was completely devastated by 20 years of gruesome dictatorship that has no comparison in today's world. 

Besides, on the occasion mentioned above, the British Ambassador merely provided help as mediator between two major political forces who wouldn't even talk to each other otherwise. 

As a matter of fact this is the real Italian problem:  Resentment. 

Nonetheless, since this is a major structural problem that has affected Italian society since the dawn of time, political leaders tend to exaggerate International conspiracies as an excuse to avoid such a hot topic.

Politicians in Italy do not talk to each other because they see each other not as adversaries but as enemies.  

Resentment in Italy is the real engine that moves Italy's politics forward. 

To make yourself an idea, take Richard Nixon's enemy list attitude and multiply it by a thousand, and you're still nowhere near it. You have to imagine a country of politicians who have no political adversaries but enemies.

Where all this hatred comes from?

Well my idea is that it's a combination of several factors that piled up along the past seventy years. 

The Fosse Ardeatine massacre can be probably considered as the major inciting incident of this chain of hatred as it's still an open wound even in today's Italy. 

The Fosse Ardeatine was a mass killing carried out in Rome on 24 March 1944 by German occupation troops during the Second World War as a reprisal for a partisan attack conducted on the previous day in central Rome against the SS Police Regiment Bozen.

This is probably the possible inciting incident for which left and right used as their favorite blame game, which started and fuelled a series of retaliation events which have been keeping Italians divided between left and right since the last world war (which was also Italy's civil war) and that lasted for seventy years because that "original sin" transformed itself along the way assuming different forms that made people forget the very reason why they kept blaming and hating each other.

Since then, resentment in Italy perpetuated through time. generation after generation. 

Still at today you can see Millennials who claim to be "fascist" or "communist". 

Italy's politics not only was absolutely unable to understand or contain this huge wave of resentment and hatred that sparked across the country for the past 70 years, not only they did absolutely nothing to cool it down but Italian political parties actually exploited such negative feelings for parochial interests with the only result of dividing Italian society even more. 

Leftist politicians reminded their voters of the Fosse Ardeatine, Right Wing politicians recalled Stalin's purges while Italians were in the middle of this storm that only aimed to harvest more hate among the very same people: neighbors, relatives, friends were pulled to keep each other away because of different political affiliation. 

You have to consider other relevant historical factors that helped keeping up these divisions: During the Cold War Italy was the battlefield of the two superpowers because of its strategical position in the Mediterranean sea. Although the Cold War ended in 1989 and since then we saw no political leader who acted as Peacemaker between the two factions that kept hating each other for whatever reason that piled up along the way. 

The main problem with a negative feeling like hate is that it transforms itself along the way. As a matter of fact left and right parties are almost the same in today's political arena as last century ideological stances have completely vanished like snow in the sun but hatred stays on as it flows throughout a giant invisible system of communicating vases. 

You want to take a look at it? Just tune yourself into any of Italy's political debates, you'll see people screaming at each other for the whole time and that's not folklore. It's gratuitous baseless hatred. I would like to pop up in any of these pathetic public shows just to say: "wake up! war is over since 1943." Unfortunately, Italian tv networks are so primitive they still base their concept of audience development upon physical altercation. Hence no peace talk in sight. 

A famous Italian sentence which still at today is used in convivial occasions is "let's not talk about politics if we want to stay friends". Like if politics would carry with it a sort of unspeakable gloomy curse. 

I would like to remind here the words of one of the greatest mentors I had to chance to have in my academic career and that's Professor Richard Weisberg from Yeshiva University whose work was the subject of my JD final thesis.

Professor Weisberg is the leading figure of a movement called Law & Literature, a literary stream that sees the participation of some of the major legal figures of our times, like Judge Richard Posner and Dr. Robin West. 

Law & Literature explores the connection between revenge, resentment and Law along the course of human history and according to Professor Weisberg "the resented legal professional can make more damage than an atomic bomb". That is to say that the negative energy or "ressentiment" that has been fuelling Italy's politics in the past 70 years has to be overcome or definetely abandoned by the Italian people if they want to enter a real Consciousness Shift or if they expect any change to happen, otherwise they will be facing the same c(o)urse of the past.

Being this the situation I think we have to say thank you to the British Ambassador for trying to provide our ressented political leaders with some of his communication wisdom. Otherwise, being the 5 stars considered by the Democratic Party a protest movement while the Democratic Party being seen as affiliated with the establishment by the other, no compromise would have been possible without a foreign facilitator.   

We have to consider that Democracy of sorts had existed in England for centuries - as far back as 1432, while Italy became a democracy on June 2 1946.  

Britain never lost a war while Italy lost two. I think you have to consider these things when you talk to someone who represents a country with such a respectable reputation and whose only objective is to help your political leaders simply to talk each other. 

@giallucad